(Oldest Posts First) - Go To The Latest Post
Palestine flags get flown by people who dont support the abuse of Palestinian people by Israel and their allies. Nothing wrong with that. Lee was skilled in battle no doubt but his opposition to equality for blacks is major negative against him. KillingFields (Limerick) - Posts: 1636 - 19/06/2020 17:09:08 2281293 Link 1 |
"while there may be some questionable labour practices in the country" May be? Is this down to your ignorance, or are you some sort of apologist for the Qatari regime? There is no maybe about it."]No, I am not apologizing for anything with it comes to Qatar but I do claim some ignorance on what has been happening there since they won the world cup as I switched off anything to do with Qatar and the World Cup once that happened. However the issue of migrant labour (what many would call exploitation) is not just an issue in Qatar and even broader still, the use of cheap labour in emerging market countries just so that the west gorge themselves on consumer products is a moral dilemma that we all are accountable for. The challenge would be to find a country in the world hasn't got its human rights issues (including our own) but getting back to this specific issue their flag does not represent a cause or specific issue like the confederate flag does. zinny (Wexford) - Posts: 982 - 19/06/2020 17:18:31 2281294 Link 0 |
At least there is no ignorance or fake meaning to the Palestine flags they are being honest about the politics and what they stand for
Breezy (Limerick) - Posts: 1106 - 19/06/2020 18:42:17 2281299 Link 0 |
"while there may be some questionable labour practices in the country" May be? Is this down to your ignorance, or are you some sort of apologist for the Qatari regime? There is no maybe about it."]No, I am not apologizing for anything with it comes to Qatar but I do claim some ignorance on what has been happening there since they won the world cup as I switched off anything to do with Qatar and the World Cup once that happened. However the issue of migrant labour (what many would call exploitation) is not just an issue in Qatar and even broader still, the use of cheap labour in emerging market countries just so that the west gorge themselves on consumer products is a moral dilemma that we all are accountable for. The challenge would be to find a country in the world hasn't got its human rights issues (including our own) but getting back to this specific issue their flag does not represent a cause or specific issue like the confederate flag does."]Well it represents their state. And the state is building massive stadia to host the world cup they've been widely accused of illegally winning the right to host, and using exploited workers to build said stadia, endangering their lives in the process. The state built their new airport where deaths went unreported. The state is building the vast majority of apartment blocks in their high end neighbourhood, the pearl, and again using exploited workers to do so. They are preventing said workers from leaving the country and returning home too. These workers literally have no choice but to work and live in inhumane conditions, typically for a 2 year term (expect that to become indefinite if the demand for building requires it), while the local Qataris sit back and enjoy government given money funded on the blood, sweat, tears and death of exploited overseas workers. cavanman47 (Cavan) - Posts: 4135 - 19/06/2020 18:50:29 2281300 Link 4 |
The Khmer Rouge were the UN recognised government of Cambodia until the 1990s!
cavanman47 (Cavan) - Posts: 4135 - 19/06/2020 18:58:41 2281302 Link 5 |
There is no way a Munster rugby flag should be flown at GAA games imho.
galwayford (Galway) - Posts: 1927 - 19/06/2020 22:18:28 2281321 Link 2 |
Why, who have Munster offended?
Cockney_Cat (UK) - Posts: 1115 - 19/06/2020 23:22:38 2281333 Link 1 |
The reason why is solely because the South didn't win the American civil war. If it had, there is little doubt that the Stars and Bars, rather than the Stars and Stripes would be flying over UN HQ today. I can think of several countries that are recognized sovereign legal states who are quite happy to turn a blind eye to human trafficking. There are many countries in the UN today that were forged out of fire and the sword, ruthless suppression of indigenous peoples or simply for geopolitical reasons, rather than any strong claim to nationhood. The Kurds have a stronger claim to nationhood, strictly speaking, than settler societies such as Israel or South Africa. But the great power politics of the day ensured that their lands would be divided into four or five different states, and so it will in all likelihood never become a sovereign state. The UN simply tries to uphold the Westphalian system of international order which is highly imperfect, though an improvement on what went before (30 Years War etc.) It is hobbled by the fact that governments tend to be very short sighted and very self-interested, as we are seeing with the obstruction of the International Criminal Court, for instance. Gleebo (Mayo) - Posts: 1803 - 19/06/2020 23:26:21 2281334 Link 2 |
As was the Soviet Union whose regime had a terrible human rights record. Their flag was still the national flag of an official country. The confederate flag is not recognised internationally at all and doesn't represent any sovereign state. In today's context, it's a representation of an ideology that no right-minded person would agree with. There's a reason people don't fly the flag of 1930s Germany. WanPintWin (Galway) - Posts: 875 - 20/06/2020 00:22:16 2281338 Link 0 |
6 lynchings? Allegedly! Please use that word! Every single one is listed as a suicide, but yeah I understand no smoke without fire etc etc etc and please please do not quote Democrazy Now. We all understand that Afro Americans are badly treated, as are Native Americans, Hispanics etc no need to stretch things to make a point.
arock (Dublin) - Posts: 4434 - 20/06/2020 01:14:21 2281339 Link 5 |
My point being - UN recognition doesn't equal morally correct.
cavanman47 (Cavan) - Posts: 4135 - 20/06/2020 09:26:08 2281342 Link 6 |
That isn't the argument though. Flags of current recognised nations can legitimately be flown, as they represent an existing country. The confederate flag only represents an ideology now, not any nation state or even a region. Part of that ideology is abhorrent in today's world. Therefore, I think it's absolutely fair to ask for it not be flown. WanPintWin (Galway) - Posts: 875 - 20/06/2020 14:56:42 2281366 Link 0 |
Indeed. The UN is a political organization made up of its member states and as such represents the international system, which is hugely unequal and flawed, and which tends to favour politicking and side deals rather than morally-led decision making. The vast majority of countries in this world are not liberal democracies, and this gives rise to some uncomfortable compromises (some might also say hypocrisy). The spectre of the likes of China and Saudi Arabia on the Human Rights Council, for instance. While their presence there is down to the regional allocation, and there is an argument to say that only picking the "virtuous" countries will lead to the 4 Scandinavian countries talking among themselves, it is undeniably hypocritical for such states to be be put in a position to judge the human rights regimes of others. Gleebo (Mayo) - Posts: 1803 - 20/06/2020 14:57:19 2281367 Link 3 |
I think it's over 9 now and there's nfw that people have just suddenly taken to suicide by hanging themselves on a tree.
Whammo86 (Antrim) - Posts: 3111 - 20/06/2020 14:59:35 2281368 Link 6 |
Were these atrocities not happening all along ? catch22 (USA) - Posts: 1647 - 20/06/2020 16:52:30 2281375 Link 5 |
What is legitimate or illegitimate about them, other than recognition being afforded to them as a sovereign state? Strictly speaking, none of the four constituent countries of the UK are sovereign states, but few would advocate for banning England, Wales or Scotland flags (the Northern Ireland Flag being a more contentious matter). I get that people object to the confederate flag on the basis of its slavery connotations but if we're being consistent, a few other modern day ones might have to go as well. The Japanese one, for instance, could be associated with modern war crimes and slavery, as could that of the US. Maybe the answer is that no flags other than county ones get flown or brought in? Gleebo (Mayo) - Posts: 1803 - 20/06/2020 17:04:10 2281376 Link 3 |
People haven't become offended all of a sudden its just until these protests most people wernt listening. Stuff like the Rhodes statue has been rumbling on for quite a while now
Breezy (Limerick) - Posts: 1106 - 20/06/2020 17:19:33 2281377 Link 1 |
Come to think of it I have a UN flag at home which should come in handy when Na Piarsaigh Limerick are back in action
Breezy (Limerick) - Posts: 1106 - 20/06/2020 17:22:02 2281378 Link 0 |
The US military has long associations with confederate military symbols going back to the time when former confederates were accepted back in to the US army years after the civil war ended (Lee's son and nephew fought for the south in the Civil war and later, after the civil war with the US military). Back then letting them keep these symbols was seen as a way of uniting Americans.
bdbuddah (Meath) - Posts: 768 - 20/06/2020 21:35:22 2281402 Link 1 |
Mayo? Mauritatania flag is green with a yellow star and crescent. dickie10 (UK) - Posts: 532 - 20/06/2020 23:32:03 2281414 Link 1 |